Dr. Ludmilla Lobova is a political scientist, Scientific Director and Vice President of ICEUR-Vienna, specializing in political forecasting, international affairs, and the analysis of political processes under uncertainty.
A central focus of her work at ICEUR is the methodology of political forecasting. She examines the limitations of conventional expert analysis, the sources of systematic forecasting errors, and the ways in which probabilistic and Bayesian reasoning can provide a more rigorous framework for dealing with uncertainty. Rather than seeking a single “correct” prediction, this approach emphasizes assigning probabilities to possible outcomes, updating assessments as new information becomes available, and systematically learning from forecasting errors.
Her academic and analytical work also covers international relations, Russian foreign and security policy, political conflicts, and transformation processes across the post-Soviet space.
Dr. Lobova studied law, history, and political science and received her doctoral degree in 1995. In Austria, she was a Lise Meitner Fellow of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), conducting research on Russian perceptions of Austrian neutrality and its significance for European security.
She has worked with the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Research on the Consequences of War, the Austrian State Archives, and the Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe (IDM). She has also delivered lectures and seminars at the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna and the University of Vienna.
Dr. Lobova is the author of publications on Russian foreign and security policy, European security, political Islam, and ethno-political conflicts. Together with Prof. Hans-Georg Heinrich, she has also served as an editor of the academic series ICEUR Insight Studies.
At the ICEUR School of Political Forecasting, she combines decades of experience in political and regional analysis with Bayesian reasoning, scenario analysis, and probabilistic forecasting, emphasizing an approach in which the quality of a forecast depends not on an expert’s confidence, but on the ability to formulate testable assessments, account explicitly for uncertainty, and revise conclusions as new evidence emerges.